Keywords
lifecycle
professional doctoral students
support
identity
Categories
How to Cite
Abstract
This paper employs a qualitative case study to suggest how the research journey of doctoral students can be improved in educational institutions by encouraging the formation of small and informal Communities of Practice (CoP). It examines themes emerging from the feelings and opinions of four part-time professional doctorate students about their study experience and participation in their emergent CoP. A peer group developed where the students share their experience, expertise, insight, and knowledge in a caring and supportive, but informal, forum. CoP could become an effective tool to aid retention, identity development and wellbeing of postgraduate level students, factors which have been previously identified as key areas of risk. An autoethnographic approach was used to review the feelings, perceptions, and opinions of the four case study group members about their experiences of the informal CoP to date. Thematic analysis of transcripts and WhatsApp communications was used to reveal the perceived common benefits and gains from participation in the informal CoP such as joy, safe spaces, and identity development, aligning members experiences to a CoP lifecycle. The study found small group formation at doctoral programme induction, and encouragement for students to organise their own regular study days using of social channels, may impact overall success. Application and adaptation of this doctoral CoP model could form the basis for future research and a model for academic institutions to suggest to new and existing students
References
Allen, D. C., Adams, T. E., & Jones, S. (2015). Learning autoethnography: A review of autoethnography: Understanding qualitative research. Learning, 2, 2–2015.
Baker, V. L., & Lattuca, L. R. (2010). Developmental networks and learning: Toward an interdisciplinary perspective on identity development during doctoral study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 807–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903501887
Bacon, N. (2023). Belonging : What does it take to transform a neighbourhood into a community? RSA Journal, 169(1(5592)), 32–35. Retrieved from https://go.exlibris.link/JrsDMwZx
Ball, S. (1993). Self doubt and soft data: Social and technical trajectories in ethnographic fieldwork. In M. Hammersley, (Ed.), Educational research: Current issues, (pp 32–48). London, UK: The Open University and Paul Chapman Publishing.
Beckes, L., & Coan, J. A. (2011). Social baseline theory: The role of social proximity in emotion and economy of action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(12), 976-988. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00400.x
Beckes, L., & Sbarra, D. A. (2022). Social baseline theory: State of the science and new directions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.004
Bell, J. S., Murray, F. E., Davies, E. L. (2019). An investigation of the features facilitating effective collaboration between public health experts and data scientists at a hackathon. Public Health (London), 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2019.05.007
Botelho de Magalhães, M., Cotterall, S., & Mideros, D. (2019). Identity, voice and agency in two EAL doctoral writing contexts.” Journal of Second Language Writing, 43, 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.05.001
Boyatzis, R, E. (2001). Chapter 19: Stimulating self-directed learning through a managerial assessment and development course. Counterpoints, 166, 303–332. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42977800
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brouwer, J., De Matos Fernandes, C. A., Steglich, C. E., Jansen, E. P., Hofman, W. A., & Flache, A. (2022). The development of peer networks and academic performance in learning communities in higher education. Learning and Instruction, 80, 101603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101603
Carson, J., & Niklasson, M. (2023). The struggle to get a PhD: The collaborative autoethnographic accounts of two ‘journeymen.’ Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47(5), 607–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2023.2222363
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate culture. The rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Lee, L., Reinicke, B., Sarkar, R., & Anderson, R. (2015). Learning Through Interactions: Improving Project Management Through Communities of Practice. Project management journal, 46(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21473
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206
Finlay, Linda & Gough, Brendan. (2008). Reflexivity: A practical guide for researchers in health and social sciences . https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470776094
Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R. E., & McKee, A. (2002). Emotionale Führung. München: Econ.
Goode, J. (2010). The digital identity divide: How technology knowledge impacts college students. New media & society, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809343560
Greener, L. 2021. Non-supervisory support for doctoral students in business and management: A critical friend. The international Journal of Management Education, 19(2).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100463
Huntwork, M. P., Myint, M. T., Simon, E., Desselle, B., & Creel, A. M. (2024). Perceptions of communities of practice and sense of belonging: Focus groups of academic pediatric faculty. Cureus, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.63605
Kim, H. S., & Plester, B. (2021). Smashing, shaming, or polite fun and Joy? How workplace humor influences positive well-being in south korean workplaces. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 682183–682183. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682183
Lahenius, K. (2012). Communities of practice supporting doctoral studies. The International Journal of Management Education, 10(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2012.02.003
Laitinen, K., & Valo, M. (2018). Meanings of communication technology in virtual team meetings: Framing technology-related interaction. International journal of human-computer studies, 111, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.10.012
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Lee, K. (2020). A phenomenological exploration of the student experience of online PhD studies. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 15, 575–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2012.02.003
Lee, L., Reinicke, B., Sarkar, R., & Anderson, R. (2015). Learning through interactions: Improving project management through communities of practice. Project Management Journal, 46(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21473
Levitt, T. (1965, November). Exploit the Product Life Cycle. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1965/11/exploit-the-product-life-cycle
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Marler, E. K., Bruce, M. J., Abaoud, A., Henrichsen, C., Suksatan, W., Homvisetvongsa, S., & Matsuo, H. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on university students’ academic motivation, social connection, and psychological well-being. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000294
Meletiadou, E. (2022). Using peer-assisted learning/Mentoring in higher education. IAFOR Journal of Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.10.1.07
Melián, E., Reyes, J. I., & Meneses, J. (2023). The online PhD experience: A qualitative systematic review. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(1), 137 –158. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i1.6780
Meyer, M., & Dykes, J. (2020). Criteria for rigor in visualization design study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 26(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2019.2934539
Packer, M., and J. Giocoechea. 2000. Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist 35(4), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3504_02
Peng, W., Lin, J.-H., Pfeiffer, K. A., & Winn, B. (2012). Need satisfaction supportive game features as motivational determinants: An experimental study of a self-determination theory guided exergame. Media Psychology, 15(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2012.673850
Pe-Than, E. P. P., Goh, D. H.-L., & Lee, C. S. (2014). Making work fun: Investigating antecedents of perceived enjoyment in human computation games for information sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 88–99. https://doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.023
Pohjola, L., & Puusa, A. (2016). Group dynamics and the role of ICT in the lifecycle analysis of communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2015-0227
Probst, G., & Borzillo, S. (2008). Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail. European Management Journal, 26(5), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2008.05.003
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Salimi, E. A., & Banitalebi, Z. (2023). Demystifing student-university identification among virtual TEFL candidates: the case of Iran. TEFLIN Journal, 34(1), 97–115. http://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v34i1/97-115 Saunders, N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2023). Research methods for business students (9th ed.. Pearson.
Schein, E. (1997). Organisation Culture and Leadership. San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass.
Seyri, H. & Rezaee, A. A. (2022). PhD students’ identity construction in face-to-face and online contexts, Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 27(1), 48 –65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13596748.2021.2011507
Silard, A., Watson-Manheim, M. B., & Lopes, N. J. (2023). The influence of text-based technology-mediated communication on the connection quality of workplace relationships: the mediating role of emotional labor. Review of Managerial Science, 17(6), 2035 –2053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00586-w
Stokes, P. (2011). Key concepts in business and management research methods. London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stokes, P., & Wall, T. (2017). Research methods (1st ed.). Palgrave.
Studebaker, B., & Curtis, H. (2021). Building community in an online doctoral program. Christian Higher Education, 20(1–2), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15363759.2020.1852133
Subedi, K. H., Sharma, S., & Bista, K. (2022). Academic identity development of doctoral scholars in an online writing group. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 17, 279–300. https://doi.org/10.28945/5004
Subrahmanyam, K. & Šmahel, D. (2011). Constructing identity online: Identity exploration and self-presentation. In Digital youth. Advancing responsible adolescent development. New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6278-2_4
Tyndall, D. E., Forbes, I. T. H., Avery, J. J., & Powell, S. B. (2019). Fostering scholarship in doctoral education: Using a social capital framework to support PhD student writing groups. Journal of Professional Nursing,35(4), 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.02.002
Upadhyaya, P., & Vrinda. (2021). Impact of technostress on academic productivity of university students. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1647–1664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10319-9
Vacek, K., Donohue, W. J., Gates, A., Lee, A. S. J., & Simpson, S. (2021). Seeking balance within personal writing ecologies: a collaborative autoethnography of a doctoral student writing group. Studies in Continuing Education, 43(1), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2019.1703670
Vitae (2011) Researcher Development Framework. https://www.vitae.ac.uk/vitae-publications/rdf-related/researcher-development-framework-rdf-vitae.pdf/view
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Introduction to communities of practice, a brief overview of the concept and its uses.
Williams, S. (2019). Postgraduate research experience survey. London, United Kingdom: Advance HE. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/reports-publications-and-resources/postgraduate-research-experience-survey-pres
Yanto, E. S., & Pandin, M. G. R. (2023). The position of insider (EMIC) And outsider (ETIC): A review of Deborah Court and Rhonda Khair Abbas’ insider-outsider research in qualitative inquiry – new perspectives on method and meaning. The Qualitative Report, 28(2), 437–446. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6190
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study research and applications: design and methods, (6th ed.). England, United Kingdom: Sage.
Zander, A. (1982). Making groups effective. London, UK: Jossey-Bass Limited.
Zanotti, A., & Magallanes, M. L. (2015). Virtual professional communities, trajectories and lifecycles. Methaodos: Reisita de Ciencias Societies, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.17502/m.rcs.v3i1.47
Zheng, L., James, S., Walpole, G., & White, G. R. T. (2023). A communities of practice approach to promoting regional circular economy innovation: evidence from East Wales. European Planning Studies, 31(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2132785
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Jan Jones, Mervyn Ward, Patrycjusz Szubryt, Ute Franzen-Waschke, Lisa Rowe