Understanding the Early Impacts of School Mentors’ Ethics of Care on Filipino Gen Z Novice Science Educators’ Informal Professional Learning
PDF

Keywords

Ethics of Care
mentorship
informal professional learning
Gen Z
phenomenology

Categories

How to Cite

Obmerga, M., & Yambao, F. M. (2025). Understanding the Early Impacts of School Mentors’ Ethics of Care on Filipino Gen Z Novice Science Educators’ Informal Professional Learning. GILE Journal of Skills Development, 5(1), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.52398/gjsd.2025.v5.i1.pp67-91

Abstract

Care-centric mentorship plays a pivotal role in helping novice educators successfully adapt to the realities of academic institutions. As members of Generation Z begin to enter the teaching profession, they encounter a noticeable lack of formal mentorship and learning platforms tailored to their unique generational characteristics. Consequently, they turn to informal school mentors for guidance and support during this critical phase of their early careers. This study employed a Husserlian phenomenology to uncover the essence of the early impacts of the Ethics of Care provided by school mentors on the informal professional learning of Filipino Generation Z novice science teachers. Ten participants were purposefully selected from a strategic region in the Philippines, employing semi-structured interviews as the data collection method. The field texts were analysed using Colaizzi’s procedural steps to distil the phenomenon’s essence. The findings were validated through the member checking procedure and the critical friend technique. Based on the thematically analysed participants’ interviews, the study introduces the Typology of Ethics of Care-driven Informal Professional Learning, which comprises three distinct learner personas: the Mindful Member, the Grounded Inquirer, and the Utility Thinker. Shaped by caring encounters with informal mentors, each persona encapsulates focal points, fostering antecedents and formative impacts, reflecting their dynamic takeaways. These insights can inform contemporary educational organizations and school mentors in implementing evidence-based mentorship strategies and professional development interventions, ensuring contextual support that empowers this cohort to navigate institutional roles effectively and contribute meaningfully to their educational communities.

https://doi.org/10.52398/gjsd.2025.v5.i1.pp67-91
PDF

References

Abdelnasser, A. H. M. (2023). Teaching performance of pre-service science teachers in light of safety standards in science teaching. Journal of Research in Education and Psychology, 38(1), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.21608/mathj.2023.157623.1251

Aspfors, J., & Fransson, G. (2015). Research on mentor education for mentors of newly qualified teachers: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.004

Barton, E. A., & Dexter, S. (2020). Sources of teachers’ self-efficacy for technology integration from formal, informal, and independent professional learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09671-6

Bauer, T.N., Bodner, T.E., Erdogan, B., Truxillo, D.M., & Tucker, J.S. (2007). Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: A meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 707–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.707

Bellocchi, A. (2019). Early career science teacher experiences of social bonds and emotion management. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(3), 322–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21520

Bi?czycki, B., ?ukasi?ski, W., & Dorocki, S. (2023). Determinants of motivation to work in terms of Industry 4.0—the gen Z perspective. Sustainability, 15(15), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151512069

Blonder, R., & Vescio, V. (2022). Professional learning communities across science teachers’ careers: The importance of differentiating learning. Handbook of Research on Science Teacher Education, 300–312. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003098478-26

Bobis, J., & Tripet, K. (2023). Situated teacher learning in the mathematics classroom and everyday practice. In: R. J. Tierney, F. Rizvi, & K. Ercikan (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (4th ed.) (pp. 518–527). Elsevier.

Burt, N. J., & Jones, J. R. (2023). The unique needs of Generation Z in the educational work environment. Journal of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, 7(1), 1–16. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1396489

Carino, C. M. (2022). Lived experiences of college instructors with meager salary: A phenomenological study. In: 2nd International Conference on Education and Technology (ICETECH 2021) (pp. 336–342). Atlantis Press.

Cherkowski, S., & Walker, K. (2019). Mentorship for flourishing in schools: An explicit shift toward appreciative action. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 8(4), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-02-2019-0018

Chillakuri, B. (2020). Understanding generation Z expectations for effective onboarding. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(7), 1277–1296. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2020-0058

Chitpin, S. (2011). Can mentoring and reflection cause change in teaching practice? A professional development journey of a Canadian teacher educator. Professional Development in Education, 37(2), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2010.531625

Cipollone, K., Zygmunt, E., & Tancock, S. (2018). “A paradigm of possibility”: Community mentors and teacher preparation. Policy Futures in Education, 16(6), 709–728. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210317751270

Colaizzi, P. (1978). Psychological research, as the phenomenologist views it. In: R. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology (pp. 48–71). Oxford University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, D. J. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Curry, J. R., Webb, A. W., & Latham, S. J. (2016). A content analysis of images of novice teacher induction: First-semester themes. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 6(1), 44–65. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2016.06.1.04

Demirbilek, M., & Keser, S. (2022). Leadership expectations of Generation Z teachers working in educational organizations. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 7(1), 209–245. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/real/issue/69243/1021310

Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center, 17(1), 1–7. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/

Erichsen, K., & Reynolds, J. (2020). Public school accountability, workplace culture, and teacher morale. Social Science Research, 85, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.102347

Ferreira, S., & Morais, A. M. (2020). Practical work in science education: Study of different contexts of pedagogic practice. Research in Science Education, 50(4), 1547–1574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9743-6

Franco, E. A. (1988). Management in the Philippine Setting. National Bookstore Publishing, Inc.

French, W., & Weis, A. (2000). An ethics of care or an ethics of justice. In: Business Challenging Business Ethics: New Instruments for Coping with Diversity in International Business: The 12th Annual EBEN Conference (pp. 125–136). Springer Netherlands.

Gaidhani, S., Arora, L., & Sharma, B. K. (2019). Understanding the attitude of generation Z towards workplace. International Journal of Management, Technology and Engineering, 9(1), 2804–2812.

Gilligan, C. (1987). Moral orientation and moral development. In: Women and Moral Theory, (Eds.) E. F. Kittay and D. T. Meyers. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

Girardet, C. (2018). Why do some teachers change and others don’t? A review of studies about factors influencing in?service and pre?service teachers’ change in classroom management. Review of Education, 6(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3104

Hager, P. J. (2012). Informal learning. In: Seel, N. M. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer.

Hendriana, E., Christoper, A., Adhitama Zain, H. O., & Pricilia, N. (2023). The role of employer branding in work-life balance and employee retention relationship among generation Z workers: Mediation or moderation? Jurnal Manajemen Teori Dan Terapan, 16(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.20473/jmtt.v16i1.41703

Honeybun-Arnolda, E., & Obermeister, N. (2019). A climate for change: Millennials, science and the humanities. Environmental Communication, 13(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1500927

Joseph, D., Lahiri-Roy, R., & Bunn, J. (2022). A trio of teacher education voices: Developing professional relationships through co-caring and belonging during the pandemic. Qualitative Research Journal, 22(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-04-2021-0045

Keiler, L. S., Diotti, R., & Hudon, K. (2023). Supporting teachers as they support each other: Lessons concerning mentor teacher feedback to teacher mentees. Professional Development in Education, 49(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1839781

Kelchtermans, G., & Ballet, K. (2002). The micropolitics of teacher induction: A narrative biographical study on teacher socialization. Teaching & Teacher Education, 18(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00053-1

Kyndt, E., Gijbels, D., Grosemans, I., & Donche, V. (2016). Teachers’ everyday professional development: Mapping informal learning activities, antecedents, and learning outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1111–1150. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627864

Landa–Jocano, F. (2006). Filipino Value System: A Cultural Definition. PUNLAD Research House, Inc.

Laz?r, M. A. (2023). Adapting to VUCA: An exploratory study on talent resilience in the IT industry and generation Z workforce. Revista de Management Comparat International, 24(5), 792–814. https://doi.org/10.24818/RMCI.2023.7.792

Leonard, S. N. (2012). Professional conversations: Mentor teachers’ theories-in-use using the Australian National Professional Standards for Teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(12), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.3316/ielapa.727534178916623

Lewis, E. B., Rivero, A. M., Lucas, L. L., Musson, A. A., & Helding, B. A. (2021). Setting empirically informed content knowledge policy benchmarks for physical science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(8), 1238–1277. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21709

Löfström, E., & Eisenschmidt, E. (2009). Novice teachers’ perspectives on mentoring: The case of the Estonian induction year. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 681–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.12.005

Lopez, A. E. (2013). Collaborative mentorship: A mentoring approach to support and sustain teachers for equity and diversity. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 21(3), 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2013.827836

Luft, J. A., Whitworth, B. A., Berry, A., Navy, S., & Kind, V. (2019). Science education trajectories: Charting the course for teachers, educators, researchers, and policymakers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1535226

Lumby, J. (2014). Leadership preparation: Engine of transformation or social reproduction? Journal of Educational Administration and History, 46(3), 306–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2014.919901

Martín-García, J., & Dies-Álvarez, M. E. (2024). Beyond the walls of formality: The role of non-formal science activities in teachers’ professional development. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 52(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2024.2323924

Miller, A. C., & Mills, B. (2019). ‘If they don’t care, I don’t care’: Millennial and generation Z students and the impact of faculty caring. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 19(4), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v19i4.24167

Miotto, G., Del-Castillo-Feito, C., & Blanco-González, A. (2020). Reputation and legitimacy: Key factors for higher education institutions’ sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research, 112, 342–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.076

Moghaddam, R. G., Davoudi, M., Adel, S. M. R., & Amirian, S. M. R. (2020). Reflective teaching through journal writing: A study on EFL teachers’ reflection-for-action, reflection-in-action, and reflection-on-action. English Teaching and Learning, 44(3), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-019-00041-2

Mokoena, T. D., & van Tonder, G. P. (2024). Influencing beginning teachers’ autonomy: The impact of mentorship in fostering self-directed learning. International Journal of Educational Management, 38(5), 1265–1288. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-05-2023-0247

Mooney-Simmie, G., & Moles, J. (2011). Critical thinking, caring and professional agency: An emerging framework for productive mentoring. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 19(4), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2011.622081

Moore, F. M. (2008). Positional identity and science teacher professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(6), 684–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20258

Oberhauser, A. M., & Caretta, M. A. (2019). Mentoring early career women geographers in the neoliberal academy: Dialogue, reflexivity, and ethics of care. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 101(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2018.1556566

Obmerga, M. E. (2020). The impact of design thinking and grit on Filipino millennial academic supervisors’ transformational leadership attributes: A structural equation model. Asian Journal on Perspectives in Education, 1(1), 24–51. https://ajpe.feu.edu.ph/index.php/ajpe/article/view/7639

Obmerga, M. E. (2024). For whom the bell (really) tolls: A grounded theory of millennial academic supervisors’ sensemaking of communitarian values as a springboard to enrich their transformational leadership attributes. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 27(2), 283–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1862919

Omilion-Hodges, L. M., & Sugg, C. E. (2019). Millennials’ views and expectations regarding the communicative and relational behaviors of leaders: Exploring young adults’ talk about work. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 82(1), 74–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490618808043

Racol?a-Paina, N. D., & Irini, R. D. (2021). Generation Z in the workplace through the lenses of human resource professionals–a qualitative study. Calitatea, 22(183), 78–85.

Schepens, A., Aelterman, A., & Vlerick, P. (2009). Student teachers’ professional identity formation: Between being born as a teacher and becoming one. Educational Studies, 35(4), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690802648317

Shanks, R., Attard Tonna, M., Krøjgaard, F., Annette Paaske, K., Robson, D., & Bjerkholt, E. (2022). A comparative study of mentoring for new teachers. Professional Development in Education, 48(5), 751–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1744684

Smith, E. C., Starratt, G. K., McCrink, C. L., & Whitford, H. (2020). Teacher evaluation feedback and instructional practice self-efficacy in secondary school teachers. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(4), 671–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X19888568

Soncini, A., Matteucci, M. C., & Butera, F. (2024). Errors: Springboard for learning or tool for evaluation? Ambivalence in teachers’ error-related beliefs and practices. Social Psychology of Education, 27(4), 1455–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09867-y

Spiegelberg, H. (1975). The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction (2nd ed.). Springer.

Tekkumru?Kisa, M., Preston, C., Kisa, Z., Oz, E., & Morgan, J. (2021). Assessing instructional quality in science in the era of ambitious reforms: A pilot study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(2), 170–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21651

Tomkins, L., & Bristow, A. (2023). Evidence-based practice and the ethics of care: ‘What works’ or ‘what matters’? Human Relations, 76(1), 118–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267211044143

Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

Trust, T. (2012). Professional learning networks designed for teacher learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(4), 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2012.10784693

Varney, J. (2009). Humanistic mentoring: Nurturing the person within. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 45(3), 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2009.10517302

Vesterinen, V. M., Tolppanen, S., & Aksela, M. (2016). Toward citizenship science education: What students do to make the world a better place? International Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1125035

Vikaraman, S. S., Mansor, A. N., & Hamzah, M. I. M. (2017). Mentoring and coaching practices for beginner teachers—a need for mentor coaching skills training and principal’s support. Creative Education, 8(1), 156–169. http://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.81013

Walters, W., Robinson, D. B., & Walters, J. (2020). Mentoring as meaningful professional development: The influence of mentoring on in-service teachers’ identity and practice. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 9(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-01-2019-0005

Zirkel, P. A., & Barnes, M. B. (2011). Negligence liability of K–12 chemistry teachers: The need for legal balance and responsible action. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(8), 1057–1061. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100869z

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Marwin E. Obmerga, Dr. Francis Michael P. Yambao