Abstract
The emergence of Generation Z as future professional teachers is reshaping the educational landscape, particularly within science education. Despite their increasing presence in pre-service teacher training, limited scholarship exists on their cognitive, affective, and psychomotor dispositions, especially within developing nations of the Global South. Considering their neoliberal orientations and their pivotal role in realising Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4 on Quality Education, this study examined how Sustainability Education Mindset (SEM) and Project Management Skills (PMS) influence their Innovative Pedagogical Disposition (IPD). Employing a quantitative design with bivariate (correlation) and multivariate (multiple regression) analyses, the study involved 141 Gen Z pre-service science teachers across key regions in the Philippines who completed the robotfoto and standardised instruments. Results revealed significant positive associations between several SEM and PMS sub-dimensions, although some pairings showed inverse relationships, reflecting the nuanced and multifaceted nature of their professional formation. Notably, SEM dimensions such as Democratic Education and Inclusiveness in Education, alongside PMS components like Communication Skills and Managerial Competences, emerged as significant positive predictors of multiple IPD sub-dimensions. Theoretically, the findings advance understanding of how sustainability-oriented mindsets and budding managerial proficiencies coalesce to shape innovative pedagogical tendencies among emerging science educators. Practically, the study underscores the necessity of embedding sustainability and project-based skill development in teacher education curricula to nurture Gen Z educators as agents of pedagogical innovation and dynamic sustainability.
References
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior (pp. 11–39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
Anwar, A., Achiraeniwati, E., & Djaohari, A. H. N. (2020). Young people activities in the responsibility of environmental sustainability: Indonesian perspective. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 830(4), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/830/4/042005
Arkhipova M.V., Belova E.E., Gavrikova Y.A., Pleskanyuk T.N., & Arkhipov A.N. (2019). Reaching Generation Z: Attitude toward technology among the newest generation of school students. In E. Popkova & V. Ostrovskaya (Eds.), Perspectives on the Use of New Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in the Modern Economy. ISC 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 726, (pp. 1026–1032). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90835-9_114
Çam-Tosun, F., & Sögüt, S. (2024). Development and validation of a sustainable education scale. Sustainable Development, 32(4), 4082–4096. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2892
Canbazoglu-Bilici, S., Guzey, S. S., & Yamak, H. (2016). Assessing pre-service science teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through observations and lesson plans. Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(2), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2016.1144050
Chan, C. K. Y., & Lee, K. K. W. (2023). The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers? Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3
Coles, R. (2016). Visionary pragmatism: Radical and ecological democracy in neoliberal times. Duke University Press.
Dabke, D. (2018). Leadership styles in the VUCA World, Through the eyes of Gen Z. In S. Dhir & Sushil (Eds.), Flexible Strategies in VUCA Markets. Flexible Systems Management (pp. 201–211). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8926-8_15
Dajic, M. J., Lalic, D. C., Vujicic, M. D., Stankov, U., Petrovic, M., & Duric, Ž. (2024). Development and validation of the project manager skills scale (PMSS): An empirical approach. Heliyon, 10(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25055
DeHaan, R. L. (2009). Teaching creativity and inventive problem solving in science. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 8(3), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08-12-0081
Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center, 1–7. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/
Donnelly, D. F., & Hume, A. (2014). Using collaborative technology to enhance pre-service teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 33(1), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2014.977782
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Fix, G. M., Rikkerink, M., Ritzen, H. T. M., Pieters, J. M., & Kuiper, W. A. J. M. (2021). Learning within sustainable educational innovation: An analysis of teachers’ perceptions and leadership practice. Journal of Educational Change, 22(1), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09410-2
Fujii, H., & Lee, S. K. (2024). Science education for sustainable development in Asia. Springer Nature.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Harari, T. T., Sela, Y., & Bareket-Bojmel, L. (2023). Gen Z during the COVID-19 crisis: A comparative analysis of the differences between Gen Z and Gen X in resilience, values and attitudes. Current Psychology, 42, 24223–24232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03501-4
Jerusalem, R. Y. (2020). Teachers’ innovative teaching strategies: Scale development using exploratory factor analysis. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 8(2), 80–95. https://www.researchpublish.com/papers/teachers-innovative-teaching-strategies-scale-development-using-exploratory-factor-analysis
Kalsoom, Q., & Qureshi, N. (2021). Impact of sustainability-focused learning intervention on teachers’ agency to teach for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(6), 540–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2021.1880983
Kelchtermans, G., & Ballet, K. (2002). The micropolitics of teacher induction: A narrative bibliographical study on teacher socializations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00053-1
Khadri, H. O. (2022). Becoming future-proof STEM teachers for enhancing sustainable development: A proposed general framework for capacity-building programs in future studies. Prospects, 52, 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-021-09588-0
Kim, J., & Lee, K. S. S. (2020). Conceptual model to predict Filipino teachers’ adoption of ICT-based instruction in class: using the UTAUT model. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(4), 699–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1776213
Kolleck, N., Schuster, J., Hartmann, U., & Gräsel, C. (2021). Teachers’ professional collaboration and trust relationships: An inferential social network analysis of teacher teams. Research in Education, 111(1), 89– 107. https://doi.org/10.1177/00345237211031585
Kyle, W. C. (2020). Expanding our views of science education to address sustainable development, empowerment, and social transformation. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0018-5
Landa-Jocano, F. (2006). Filipino value system: A cultural definition. Punlad Research House.
Lautenbach, F., & Heyder, A. (2019). Changing attitudes to inclusion in preservice teacher education: A systematic review. Educational Research, 61(2), 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1596035
Lazar, M.-A., Zbuchea, A., & Pînzaru, D. (2023). The emerging Generation Z workforce in the digital world: A literature review on cooperation and transformation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 17(1), 1991–2001. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2023-0175
Li, Y., Sun, T., Shou, Y., & Sun, H. (2020). What makes a competent international project manager in emerging and developing countries? Project Management Journal, 51(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820901387
Liou, D. D., & Rojas, L. (2022). Reimagining expectations and rigor in the college classroom amid the global pandemic: Lessons from the field. About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience, 26(6), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/10864822221082694
Lowell, V. L., & Moore, R. L. (2020). Developing practical knowledge and skills of online instructional design students through authentic learning and real-world activities. TechTrends, 64(4), 581–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00518-z
Mahapatra, G. P., Bhullar, N., & Gupta, P. (2022). Gen Z: An emerging phenomenon. NHRD Network Journal, 15(2), 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/26314541221077137
Maila, M. W., & Pitsoe, V. J. (2012). Globalization, sustainability and ethics: What are the critical links for present and future generations? Journal of Human Ecology, 40(1), 43–51. http://krepublishers.com/02-Journals/JHE/JHE-40-0-000-12-Web/JHE-40-1-12-Abst-PDF/JHE-40-1-043-12-2316-Maila-M/JHE-40-1-043-51-12-2316-Maila-M-Tx%5B5%5D.pdf
Marangio, K., Carpendale, J., Cooper, R., & Mansfield, J. (2024). Supporting the development of science pre-service teachers’ creativity and critical thinking in secondary science initial teacher education. Research in Science Education, 54(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10104-x
McCunn, L. J., Bjornson, A., & Alexander, D. (2020). Teaching sustainability across curricula: Understanding faculty perspectives at Vancouver Island University. The Curriculum Journal, 31(3), 557–572. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.16
McNaughton, M. J. (2012). Implementing Education for Sustainable Development in schools: Learning from teachers’ reflections. Environmental Education Research, 18(6), 765–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.665850
Menon, D., Cheng, D.S. & Ngugi, R. (2024). Investigating preservice secondary teachers’ understanding and enactment of the standards-based practices during microteaching. Journal for STEM Education Research, 7, 63–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-023-00093-x
Obmerga, M. E. (2025). The impact of design thinking and innovative work behaviours on Filipino Gen Z novice science educators’ safe laboratory teaching praxis. Southeast Asian Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 58–72. https://www.seameo-stemed.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/SAJSE-Vol5-No1_Jan-2025.pdf
Obmerga, M. E., & Yambao, F. M. P. (2025). Understanding the early impacts of school mentors’ ethics of care on Filipino Gen Z novice science educators’ informal professional learning. GILE Journal of Skills Development, 5(1), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.52398/gjsd.2025.v5.i1.pp67-91
Parks, E. S. (2020). Listening across the ages: Measuring generational listening differences with the LCI-R. International Journal of Listening, 36(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2020.1748503
Parry, S., & Metzger, E. (2023). Barriers to learning for sustainability: A teacher perspective. Sustainable Earth Reviews, 6(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-022-00050-3
Pramana, H. P., Hastjarjo, S., & Sudarmo (2021). Millennial and Gen Z perspective towards eco-office campaign implementation in public sector. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 905(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/905/1/012122
Rodríguez-Montequín, V., Villanueva-Balsera, J., Cousillas-Fernández, S. M., & Ortega-Fernández, F. (2018). Exploring project complexity through project failure factors: Analysis of cluster patterns using self-organizing maps. Complexity, 2018, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9496731
Rombaoa, J. S. J. (2019). The cost of technology integration on Filipino families with children enrolled in public schools. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09597-x
Ruhrig, J., & Höttecke, D. (2015). Components of science teachers’ professional competence and their orientational frameworks when dealing with uncertain evidence in science teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 447–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9628-3
Sela, O., & Harel, M. (2018). ‘You have to prove yourself, initiate projects, be active’: The role of novice teachers in their own induction process. Professional Development in Education, 45(2), 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1441173
Smith, T., Avraamidou, L., & Adams, J. D. (2022). Culturally relevant/responsive and sustaining pedagogies in science education: theoretical perspectives and curriculum implications. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 17(3), 637–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10082-4
Soper, D. S. (2025). A-Priori Sample Size Calculator for Multiple Regression (Version 4). Free Statistics Calculators [Web-based Software]. https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc/calculator.aspx?id=1
Symaco, L. P. (2013). Geographies of social exclusion: Education access in the Philippines. Comparative Education, 49(3), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2013.803784
Toledo, R. F. de, Farias Filho, J. R. de, Castro, H. C. G. A. de, Putnik, G. D., & Silva, L. E. da. (2021). Is the incorporation of sustainability issues and Sustainable Development Goals in project management a catalyst for sustainable project delivery? International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(8), 733–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2021.1888816
Van Katwijk, L., Jansen, E., & Van Veen, K. (2021). Pre-service teacher research: A way to future-proof teachers? European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(3), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1928070
Weber, K. M., & Keim, H. (2021). Meeting the needs of Generation Z college students through out-of-class interactions. About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience, 26(2), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086482220971272

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Marwin E. Obmerga