Abstract
Despite a growing body of research exploring e-mentoring among women, literature on e-mentoring in peer teaching between women scholars is limited. Women scholars often face challenges which hinder their academic progress. These challenges include gender bias, limited access to professional networks, and difficulty in balancing work and family responsibilities. Aiming to foster an inclusive research community for women from diverse backgrounds, this exploratory study examined the experience of six women scholars in a 6-week Pilot E-mentoring Peer Program hosted by the Ronin Institute Women’s Interest Group. The objectives of this pilot program were to empower women scholars by offering professional and psychosocial support from their peer scholars. Participants were asked to create a participant profile followed by a self-matching process to find their peer-mentor. Participants were expected to communicate at least one hour every week for six weeks via an agreed digital communication method with self-directed mentoring goals. A survey, including Likert scale, open-ended and close-ended questions, was designed to explore participants’ experience of the program. We conducted basic text analysis on the open-ended responses and used a descriptive approach to present the results. Our findings evidenced the presence of professional and psychosocial support between participants, achieving the aim of this pilot program.
Recommendations for future improvements include extending the mentoring period, expanding participant networks, and offering continued support after the program finished. The practical implication of such programs has the potential to create inclusive academic environments that support underrepresented groups.
References
Diele-Viegas, L. M., de Almeida, T. S., Amati-Martins I., Bacon, C. D., Cassia-Silva, C., Collevatti, R. G., Cordeiro, T. E. F., Fenker, J., Ferrari, G., Franco, A. C. S., Gasparetto, L. F., Hipólito, J., Hohlenwerger, C., Hörmanseder, B, de Jesus, P. B., Matos, S., Mejía, D. P., Murer, B. M., Pavone, C. B., … Virginio, F. (2021). Gender inequality and not female mentors hinder female scientists career outcomes. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/s83zk
Gish-Lieberman, J. J., Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., Tawfik, A. A., & Theiling, T. M. (2021). Designing for self-efficacy: E-mentoring training for white and BIPOC women in STEM. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 12(3), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v12i3.31433
McLoughlin, C., Brady, J., Lee, M. J., & Russell, R. (2007). Peer-to-peer: An e-mentoring approach to developing community, mutual engagement and professional identity for pre-service teachers. https://bibliotecadigital.mineduc.cl/handle/20.500.12365/17803
Maguire, K. R., Anderson, A. M., & Chavez, T. E. (2024). Shared wisdom: A collaborative autoethnography on mentorship and women supporting women in academia. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 32(3), 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2024.2332952
Mahayosnand, P. P. (2024). Research writing, peer review and academic publishing. GILE Journal of Skills Development, 4(1), 136–140. https://doi.org/10.52398/gjsd.2024.v4.i1.pp136-140
Mahayosnand, P. P., Zanders, L., Sabra, Z. M., Essa, S., Ahmed, S., Bermejo, D. M., Funmilayo, M., Sabra, D. M., & Ablay, S. (2021). E-mentoring female underrepresented public health student researchers: Supporting a more diverse postpandemic workforce. Health Security, 19 (S1), S-72. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2021.0042
Mayer, A. P., Blair, J. E., Ko, M. G., Patel, S. I., & Files, J. A. (2014). Long-term follow-up of a facilitated peer mentoring program. Medical Teacher, 36(3), 260–266. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.858111
Murphy, W. M., Gibson, K. R., & Kram, K. E. (2024). Advancing women through developmental relationships. In S. R. Madsen (Ed.), Handbook of research on gender and leadership (pp.374–391). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035306893.00036
Neely, A. R., Cotton, J. L., & Neely, A. D. (2017). E-mentoring: A model and review of the literature. Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 9(3), 220-242. https://aisel.aisnet.org/thci/vol9/iss3/3
Ntshongwana, Z. (2024). The importance of mentorship opportunities for women in academia: A systematic review. African Journal of Inter/Multidisciplinary Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.51415/ajims.v6i1.1430
Rockinson-Szapkiw, A., Herring Watson, J., Gishbaugher, J., & Wendt, J. L. (2021). A case for a virtual STEM peer-mentoring experience for racial and ethnic minority women mentees. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 10(3), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-08-2020-0053
Sambunjak, D., Straus, S. E., & Marusic, A. (2010). A systematic review of qualitative research on the meaning and characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(1), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1165-8
Schmidt, K. E., & Faber, S. T. (2016). Benefits of peer mentoring to mentors, female mentees and higher education institutions. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(2), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2016.1170560
Sinclair, S., & Rockwell, G. (2016). Voyant Tools. [Web application]. http://voyant-tools.org/
Smith, C. A., McLure, F., Kuzich, S., Ferns, S., & Murphy, S. (2024). Empowering second career female academics: strengthening relationships through mentoring for personal and professional growth. Advancing Women in Leadership, 43, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21423/awlj-v43.a416
Wendt, J. L., & Jones, V. O. (2024). Peer mentors’ experiences in an online STEM peer mentoring program: “beacons of light.” International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 13(3), 328–345. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmce-03-2023-0033

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ponn P. Mahayosnand, WS Chan, Gloria Gheno, Hafsa Shah