Domestic and International Doctoral Students’ Motivation to Study at Hungarian Universities
PDF

Keywords

self-determination
theory
motivation
doctoral students
higher education
internationalisation

Categories

How to Cite

Borodina, D., & Estrela Pereira, A. (2025). Domestic and International Doctoral Students’ Motivation to Study at Hungarian Universities: A Comparative Study. GILE Journal of Skills Development, 5(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.52398/gjsd.2025.v5.i1.pp131-148

Abstract

Hungary is a member of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) and follows a three-cycle higher education system based on the Bologna Process. Raising the number of international and domestic PhD students improves the position of Hungarian universities in international competition for higher education. There are around ten thousand full-time doctoral students; nearly 32% are internationals in Hungary, according to the Central Statistical Office. A great number of higher education institutions develop doctoral programs to attract more domestic and international students, hence, it is significantly important to get to know about students’ motivation to enrol in doctoral study in Hungary. This study was conducted in 2023 and examined international and domestic students’ motivation using the two-factor model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation proposed by the self-determination theory of human motivation. A questionnaire was administered to 100 international doctoral students, 45 males and 55 females, aged 25 to 45, and to 100 domestic doctoral students, 38 males and 62 females, aged 25 to 48 to explore the motivation to attend a Hungarian university. The results of the study show that the respondents endorsed more items on intrinsic motivation than on extrinsic motivation. There is a significant difference in motivation among domestic and international doctoral students at Hungarian universities. Domestic students demonstrate a higher level of motivation to get knowledge and a higher level of introjected regulation. International doctoral students show a higher level of amotivation compared to domestic students. The existing literature on international education is mostly focused on the skills and benefits students gain, but there has been limited research on doctoral students' motivation. At the same time, knowledge about international and domestic doctoral students' motivation can be used in program development which fits more to the motivational characteristics of doctoral students.

https://doi.org/10.52398/gjsd.2025.v5.i1.pp131-148
PDF

References

Alivernini, F., Lucidi, F., & Manganelli, S. (2008). Assessment of academic motivation: A mixed methods study. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 2(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.455.2.1.71

Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2007). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315307303542

Areepattamannil, S., Freeman, J. G., & Klinger, D. A. (2011). Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and academic achievement among Indian adolescents in Canada and India. Social Psychology of Education, 14(3), 427–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-011-9155-1

Bair, C. R., & Haworth, J. G. (2004). Doctoral student attrition and persistence: A meta-synthesis of research. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 481–534). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2456-8_11

Baldwin, G., & James, R. (2000). The market in Australian higher education and the concept of student as informed consumer. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/713678146

Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740–756. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3

Boekaerts, M., & Cascallar, E. (2006). How far have we moved toward the integration of theory and practice in self-regulation? Educational Psychology Review, 18(3), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9013-4

Chen, K.-C., & Jang, S.-J. (2010). Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 741–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.011

Chirkov, V., Vansteenkiste, M., Tao, R., & Lynch, M. (2007). The role of self-determined motivation and goals for study abroad in the adaptation of international students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31(2), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2006.03.002

Chue, K. L., & Nie, Y. (2016). International students’ motivation and learning approach: A comparison with local students. Journal of International Students, 6(3), 678–699. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v6i3.349

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Conceptualizations of intrinsic motivation and self-determination. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (pp. 11–40). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7_2

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801

Deci, E., Vallerand, R., Pelletier, L., & Ryan, R. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_6

Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.

Hair, J. F. (2011). Multivariate data analysis: An overview. International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, 904–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_395

Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 638–645. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.3.638

Ivankova, N. V., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Students’ persistence in a distributed doctoral program in educational leadership in higher education: A mixed methods study. Research in Higher Education, 48(1), 93–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9025-4

Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Kim, A. (2009). Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically oriented Korean students? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 644–661. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014241

Knight, J. (1997). A conceptual framework for the regionalization of higher education: Application to Asia. In J. N. Hawkins, K. H. Mok & D. E. Neubauer (Eds.), Higher education regionalization in Asia Pacific: Implications for governance, citizenship and university transformation (pp. 17–36). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137311801.0008

Koenka, A. C. (2020). Academic motivation theories revisited: An interactive dialog between motivation scholars on recent contributions, underexplored issues, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101831

Kupriyanova, V., & Ferencz, I. (2022). Attraction and support of international PhD students, lecturers and researchers in Hungary: State-of-the-art, challenges and areas of improvement. Tempus Public Foundation. https://tka.hu/publication/16247/attraction-and-support-of-international-phd-students-lecturers-and-researches-in-hungary-state-of-the-art-challenges-and-areas-of-improvement

Lin, Y.-G., McKeachie, W. J., & Kim, Y. C. (2003). College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 13(3), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1041-6080(02)00092-4

Litalien, D., & Guay, F. (2012). Construction and validation of a scale assessing motivation toward PhD studies. PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e641162012-001

Litalien, D., Tóth-Király, I., Guay, F., & Morin, A. (2023). PhD students’ motivation profiles: A self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 77. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4613407

Liu, W. C., Wang, C. K. J., Tan, O. S., Koh, C., & Ee, J. (2009). A self-determination approach to understanding students’ motivation in project work. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.07.002

Marais, G. A. B., Shankland, R., Haag, P., Fiault, R., & Juniper, B. (2018). A survey and a positive psychology intervention on French PhD student well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 109–138. https://doi.org/10.28945/3948

Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318

Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L. G., Clément, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self?determination theory. Language Learning, 53(S1), 33–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.53223

Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Briere, N. M. (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion, 25(4), 279–306. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014805132406

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeider (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50043-3

Pyhältö, K., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2009). Developing scholarly communities as learning environments for doctoral students. International Journal for Academic Development, 14(3), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440903106551

Pyhältö, K., Toom, A., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2012). Challenges of becoming a scholar: A study of doctoral students’ problems and well-being. ISRN Education, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/934941

Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68

Sakurai, Y., Vekkaila, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2017). More or less engaged in doctoral studies? Domestic and international students’ satisfaction and motivation for doctoral studies in Finland. Research in Comparative and International Education, 12(2), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499917711543

Schunk, D. H. (2005). Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_3

Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed). Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.

Spaulding, L. S, & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. (2012). Hearing their voices: Factors doctoral candidates attribute to their persistence. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 199–219. https://doi.org/10.28945/1589

Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2003). A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.95.1.97

Stubb, J., Pyhältö, K., & Lonka, K. (2011). Balancing between inspiration and exhaustion: PhD students’ experienced socio-psychological well-being. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037x.2010.515572

Sverdlik, A., C. Hall, N., McAlpine, L., & Hubbard, K. (2018). The PhD experience: A review of the factors influencing doctoral students’ completion, achievement, and well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 361–388. https://doi.org/10.28945/4113

Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 271–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60019-2

Vallerand, R. J., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., & Pelletier, L. G. (1989). Échelle de motivation en éducation. PsycTESTS Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/t85058-000

Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025

Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 41(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4101 4

Wao, H.O, & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2011). A mixed research investigation of factors related to time to the doctorate in Education. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 6, 115–134. https://doi.org/10.28945/1505

Wehmeyer, M. L., Abery, B. H., Zhang, D., Ward, K., Willis, D., Hossain, W. A., Balcazar, F., Ball, A., Bacon, A., Calkins, C., Heller, T., Goode, T., Dias, R., Jesien, G. S., McVeigh, T., Nygren, M. A., Palmer, S. B., & Walker, H. M. (2011). Personal self-determination and moderating variables that impact efforts to promote self-determination. Exceptionality, 19(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2011.537225

Zhou, M., Ma, W. J., & Deci, E. L. (2009). The importance of autonomy for rural Chinese children’s motivation for learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 492–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.05.003

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Daria Borodina, Adrian Estrela Pereira